Always missing out on the QuTS Hero for this unit 
You probably would not want Hero on this NAS. The memory and CPU requirements for Hero are more demanding than with QTS. Inline deduplication and compression take quite a bit of both.
Due to hardware specifications and performance limitations, we currently have no plans to support QuTS hero on this specific model. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Thank you for your understanding!
I mean…….
I have QuTS on a TS-264 Covid edition (soldered 8gb RAM) running QuTS.
From what I can find on google images 464C has a different case.
Exactly in what way does a TS-464C with a
- Celeron ® N5095 quad-core
- Intel® UHD Graphics
- 8 GB onboard (non-expandable)
- 4GB (Dual Boot OS Protection)
- 4 x 3.5" SATA 6Gb/s, 3Gb/s
- Slot 1: M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe Gen 3 x2
- Slot 2: M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe Gen 3 x2
- Minimum 84W adapter, 100-240V
Different from my TS-264Covid
- Celeron ® N5095 quad-core
- Intel® UHD Graphics
- 8 GB onboard (SODIMM after 2024/01)
- 4GB (Dual Boot OS Protection)
- 2 x 3.5" SATA 6Gb/s, 3Gb/s
- Slot 1: M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe Gen 3 x2
- Slot 2: M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe Gen 3 x2
- 90W adapter, 100-240V
Again, I already have QuTS
Maybe you are running QuTS on that machine, but does it make sense? About the only advantage you get with 8 GB memory is WORM. You can’t take advantage of on the fly deduplication or compression.
I do get compression.
I also get much better filesystem performance when snapshotting or fun things like zfs send/receive.
Oh, and just zfs being better then ext4 for archiving.
If we were talking btrfs on QTS vs. ZFS/QuTS yeah I wouldn’t care. But since I paid basically nothing for a 2 bay NAS and put 18TB enterprise drives in it…. nah I want ZFS
1 Like